Petition to Redefine Gay Marriage

A young man by the name of Mike Raven has started a petition to correct the definition of marriage. Raven is a current MFA graduate student of Full Sail University and resident of Newmarket, NH.

Raven mentions that the website’s current definition of marriage, “a social institution under which man and woman establish their decision to live together as husband and wife by legal commitments, religious ceremonies, etc.” compared to the definition of same-sex marriage, “a similar institution involving partners of the same sex” is a mere “separate but ‘equal’ styled wording and placement.”

With roughly 50 million visitors per month, Raven would like to correct their definition of the word ‘marriage’ in this way: “Two consenting adults, entering into a life-long relationship as husband and wife, husband and husband, or wife and wife, based on love and commitment.”

Raven states, “By correcting the definition, we could affect legal arguments. We could affect naysayer’s perception. We could raise awareness in a positive way and reinvigorate the energy of those who’d like to see a different, better world. And we can finally call ‘gay marriage’ what it should be called: marriage.”

Raven mentions that he started this campaign for three reasons; his love and fascination with words, his frustration that the fight for marriage equality is still going on, and most of all, from the love he has for his twin sister, who is currently in a committed, loving, same-sex relationship.

The petition has already reached over 100,000 signatures, and the number continues to rise every day. The story has also been picked up by websites such as the Huffington Post,, Instinct Magazine, as well as other online publications.

Please click here to see the petition online. Mike Raven can be reached at rave86(at) or 843-696-0516.


4 Responses

Write a Comment»
  1. +2 Vote -1 Vote +1Tom Williams

    Why is it neccesary to change the definition of an institution thats been around for thousands of years? The purpose of “marriage” is to track the biological lineage through the generations. If two people of the same sex love eachother, thats perfectly fine. They should be able to bond for eternity. Come up with another term. Whats wrong with civil union? Marriage is already taken. It has a specific definition that ought not be tampered with. You can’t change history.

  2. -1 Vote -1 Vote +1Jason Knights

    Tom, the problem with a civil union is that many laws specifically require a legal marriage and civil unions often don’t provide the same protections and benefits as marriage. Ultimately though, I agree with you. From a legal perspective, we should make all redefine all marriages civil unions and assign benefits responsibilities from that. Get government out of the marriage business and religion out of the legal civil unions business and most of these arguments go away.

  3. +2 Vote -1 Vote +1Dave Ballum


    Then change the laws, not the institution.

  4. +2 Vote -1 Vote +1MJM

    39 (I believe that’s the number) states have constitutionally defined marriage as between a man and a woman. Seems to me’s definition is accurate.

Leave a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared.


Connect with Facebook


Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.