
This is not a happy movie. It’s based on a Swedish book of the same name, which I read in preparation for seeing this movie. I don’t watch violent movies, and I had been warned that it would be, but I could also tell that it would be one of the big movies of 2011. So – full disclosure – I read the book before I saw the movie to give myself an idea of when to close my eyes. The book is disturbing in itself, but I’m very glad I read it because it was fascinating to compare it to the movie. This is the most accurate book to movie adaptation I have ever seen. The characters and the essential parts of the plot are almost unchanged, and I think this is a tribute both to the careful work of the director and screen writer, and to the actors, several of whom closely studied the books to gain a full background of their characters. It shows.
This is not a horror movie, but its content is, if that makes sense. It’s meant to be a mystery and a thriller, which it is. I knew what was going to happen and yet I still felt charged with suspense throughout the film – all two and a half hours of it. To its credit, I never got bored or felt its length – the pacing is perfect.
The story opens with our main character Mikael Blomkvist (Daniel Craig) who is a financial reporter who has just been convicted of libel (he was framed). He is hired away from his independent magazine – which he co-runs with his lover Erika – to write a biography of a wealthy company owner named Henrik Vanger (Christopher Plummer). Vanger lives on an island with what’s left of his crazy family, who all hate each other. Blomkvist soon learns that his actual objective is to solve the murder of Vanger’s niece Harriet, who disappeared from the island forty years ago. Blomkvist spends most of his time going through boxes of ancient evidence looking for clues, in a method that is very un-movie-like.
Meanwhile, we’ve been introduced to Lisbeth Salander, a tiny young woman who is a reclusive introvert and a ward of the State – classified psychologically unstable and must rely on an appointed guardian who handles her finances for her.
The audience is immediately sympathetic toward this character, who is completely expressionless, and yet the actress (Rooney Mara) conveys every emotion with apparent ease. This lonely character is a brilliant hacker, and clearly able to handle herself, but is often taken advantage of because of her size and demeanor. The audience was sometimes amused by her indifference and impatience with other characters throughout the movie, and Mara purposefully plays Salander with dry humor when there needs to be a break in the incredible amount of tension. For me, the star of the book was Salander, and the same went for the movie. Rooney Mara stole every scene she was in, and I found myself impatient to see her again whenever she wasn’t onscreen.
I don’t want to give away a single secret of this plot because the mystery is so compelling. I will say that I was a little disappointed that we got a few hints early on that weren’t in the book, but they weren’t terrible give-aways.
You do have to pay very close attention to the dialogue. Everybody speaks in a Swedish accent (except for Daniel Craig, which did annoy me) and some things are said rather fast. The details are one of my favorite parts of this movie. Something as simple as boxes that have been carried into a house during a snowstorm being damp. Of course they’d be damp, the snowflakes would melt, but in any other movie the boxes would look dry. If you see it, look for details like that; David Fincher is famous for being a director who is obsessed with details, and it shows. He is very careful to keep the movie grounded in its Swedish origins, when it could have easily been American-ized.
I said in the first paragraph that this is a very violent movie. It is, but not in the usual way. There isn’t loads of blood and gore (there is a bit of blood, and some very realistic wounds), but that’s not why everyone is finding this so hard to watch. PARTIAL SPOILER HERE, SKIP TO THE NEXT PARAGRAPH IF YOU WANT TO AVOID IT: I think it’s important to warn people that this movie contains extremely graphic scenes of sexual violence. You see everything, and the horrible aftermath of it. However, all of this is vital to the story and characters, and not one second of this movie contains gratuitous violence.
Some of the people who I’ve spoken to about the movie have said they won’t see it because of the content it contains, and I can see why. The unflinchingly honest depiction of the horrors is extremely difficult to watch. You have been warned.
If you think you can handle the movie, see it. It’s one of the best movies of the year, though admittedly one of the darkest. I predict Rooney Mara receiving a Best Actress nomination this Oscar season, and possibly (hopefully) a win. See it for the characters, the mystery, and the remarkably good directing.
My Londonderry NH Net rating, 4 seeds 
Images The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo a Columbia Pictures (c) courtesy
Visit the The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo website for trailers and promotions.
Recent Comments